← Case Studies / Digital · AI & Automation

AI Claims Processing
Cuts Manual Work by 70%

A Nordic insurer had outgrown its manual claims workflow. We designed and deployed an agentic AI pipeline that now handles over 10,000 routine claims per month — autonomously, accurately, and at scale.

70%
Reduction in manual processing cost
10K+
Claims handled per month
4 mo
Kick-off to full production
94%
Straight-through processing rate
Client
Nordic Insurance Group
Industry
Insurance
Service
Custom AI Solution
Team
6 — AI engineers, PMO, architects
Timeline
4 months, 2024
Technology
Claude AI · UiPath · Azure
The Challenge

A Claims Department Drowning in Manual Work

The client processed upwards of 15,000 insurance claims per month across home, motor, and travel lines. Over 80% were routine — standard damage reports, straightforward liability cases, low-complexity travel incidents — yet every one required a human handler to open, read, classify, verify documentation, cross-reference policy terms, and approve or decline.

The team had grown year on year just to keep pace. Average handling time sat at 22 minutes per claim. Error rates on data entry and policy lookup ran above 4%, triggering costly corrections and customer complaints. During seasonal spikes — Q1 travel claims and Q3 weather events — backlogs stretched to eleven days.

The business had explored RPA for two years with limited results. Point automations existed but broke with every policy update or document format change. What they needed was something that could read, reason, and adapt — not just follow rules.

22-minute average handling time
Handlers manually reading, classifying, and verifying each claim from scratch — regardless of its complexity.
4%+ data entry error rate
Manual transcription from PDF documents into the claims system caused downstream corrections, delays, and customer complaints.
11-day backlogs during peak periods
Seasonal volume spikes overwhelmed fixed headcount — no elastic capacity to absorb surges without SLA breaches.
Brittle rule-based RPA
Existing automations broke on every document format change or policy update, requiring constant maintenance by the IT team.
The Approach

Four Phases, Sixteen Weeks

We rejected a big-bang deployment in favour of a staged build where each phase validated the next. The insurer's claims team was involved throughout — not just as requirements-providers, but as active co-designers of the system that would replace their daily workflow.

01
Discovery & Process Mining

Mapped the full claims workflow through process mining and 40+ handler interviews. Identified 12 distinct claim types by complexity and automation potential.

Weeks 1–3
02
Agent Architecture Design

Designed a four-agent pipeline with clear handoff logic, confidence thresholds, and human escalation paths. Defined the criteria for autonomous straight-through approval.

Weeks 4–6
03
Build & Integration

Built the agentic system on Azure, integrating with the client's claims platform and document store. Ran parallel processing on 2,000 historical claims to validate accuracy before go-live.

Weeks 7–13
04
Controlled Rollout

Went live with travel claims first (lowest risk), then motor, then home. Full autonomous volume reached in week 16 with a 94% straight-through rate on all eligible claim types.

Weeks 14–16
The Solution

A Four-Agent Pipeline That Reads, Reasons, and Decides

At the core of the solution is an agentic AI pipeline where each agent has a specific role and hands off to the next with a structured payload. The system processes PDFs, emails, and web-form submissions and makes autonomous approval decisions on standard claims within seconds of receipt.

Claim Ingestion
PDF, email,
web form
Triage Agent
Classify type
& complexity
Validation Agent
Check docs
& policy match
Decision Agent
Approve, decline,
or escalate
Human Review
Edge cases &
high-value claims

The system doesn't just extract data from documents — it understands context. When a claim references a prior incident, the validation agent finds and cross-references it automatically. That kind of reasoning is what separates this from the RPA we tried before.

Head of Claims Operations — Nordic Insurance Group
The Results

From Backlog to Same-Day Processing

Six months after go-live, results exceeded the original business case targets. The client has since expanded the system to three additional claim lines not in scope for the original engagement.

70%
Reduction in manual processing cost
From an average cost of €18 per claim to under €5.50 — across all eligible claim types within 6 months of full deployment.
94%
Straight-through processing rate
94% of eligible claims are approved or declined with no human touch. The remaining 6% are correctly routed for specialist review.
<2min
Average claim resolution time
Down from 22 minutes. For straightforward travel and motor claims, the median processing time is now under 45 seconds.
0.4%
Data error rate
Down from 4.2%. Structured extraction and validation by the AI agents has virtually eliminated manual transcription errors.
10K+
Claims processed monthly
At full scale with no incremental headcount — and the system scales elastically to absorb Q1 and Q3 volume spikes without SLA impact.
4mo
Time to full production
From kick-off to autonomous volume in 16 weeks — on schedule, on budget, with no scope changes during delivery.
Technology

Built on Proven Enterprise Platforms

The stack was chosen for enterprise reliability, security, and compatibility with the client's existing infrastructure. No new vendors required additional procurement cycles or security review.

AI
Claude (Anthropic)
Core reasoning engine for document understanding, policy interpretation, and decision logic across all four agents
Automation
UiPath
Orchestration layer and integration bridge to the client's legacy claims management platform and document store
Cloud
Microsoft Azure
Hosting, document intelligence (Form Recognizer), secure storage, and full observability infrastructure
Observability
QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Continuous monitoring of agent decisions and escalation patterns — alerting the team to drift before it becomes a problem
← All case studies Next case study →
Work With Us

Ready to Automate What's Slowing You Down?

Whether you're exploring AI for the first time or looking to scale what's already working — let's talk about what's possible for your organisation.

Talk to Our AI Team →